This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

Atlas Blogged
   Quote of the Day

The thing to remember about freedom is that it is not given, it is taken

-Scott Adams

   Recent Comments
   Categories
   Administrivia

The Neolibertarian Network

Syndicate this site (XML)
XHTML | CSS
Blogarama - The Blog Directory
blog search directory Listed on BlogShares

« Presumption best precedes failure | Main | Striped Iceberg »

July 31, 2008

Hold my calls...

You make the call… is this actual news, or is it a piece of satire?

By a voice vote, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee passed the Halting Airplane Noise to Give Us Peace--or HANG UP--Act, which was introduced earlier this year by Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.).

We only wish it were satire, friends. CNET’s blog notes that the FCC and FAA already coordinate a ban on in-flight cell phone use, but apparently the House doesn’t have anything more important to do than to move the prohibition from federal policy to federal law. Representative DeFazio justified the legislation by noting that without it, airlines might offer customers choices!!!!

"Polls show the public overwhelmingly doesn't want to be subjected to people talking on their cell phones on increasingly over-packed airplanes. However, with Internet access just around the corner on U.S. flights, it won't be long before the ban on voice communications on in-flight planes is lifted," DeFazio said in a statement. Cash-strapped airlines could end up charging some passengers to use their phones while charging others to sit in a phone-free section of the plane, he said.

And that’s un-American.

The cake is taken by a House member who the AP declines to name:

A third House member raised the specter of national security, saying she'd witnessed one man use his cell phone camera to take pictures of sensitive parts of the airplane.

So let’s look at this realistically. Will it still be legal for passengers to talk to one another? Will it still be legal for passengers to talk to themselves? Is it legitimate to make my speech illegal based solely on who I am talking to? I am trying to figure out any situation in which that makes sense.

Wulf Posted by Wulf on July 31, 2008 at 10:55 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.atlasblogged.com/cgi-bin/mt/mtb.cgi/629

Comments

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember This Information?