This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

Atlas Blogged
   Quote of the Day

Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty.

-Thomas Jefferson

   Recent Comments
   Categories
   Administrivia

The Neolibertarian Network

Syndicate this site (XML)
XHTML | CSS
Blogarama - The Blog Directory
blog search directory Listed on BlogShares

« Marytrdom for Thee | Main | Reading Spellings »

November 5, 2006

Why didn't the Supreme Court play in this year's ads?

Back in January, during the Samuel Alito confirmation process, I noted the following:

If the Democrats had any confidence in their ability to win the Senate in the 2006 elections, they would have filibustered Alito and forced the Republican hand. But it seems they are wisely saving the filibuster issue for the next nominee - the one to replace John Paul Stevens. We speculate the elderly Justice Stevens will retire (or be poisoned) before the end of Bush's term. And you thought we had heard the end of the "nuclear option" vs "constitutional option" debate, and the (un)importance of Roe vs Wade.

I am very surprised that this has not been a prominent part of the Get Out The Vote efforts. I mean for the Democrats, and for the Republicans. The process is so contentious that it seems like a great strategy for both parties to rally the base. Stop the ACLU posted an article on it last night, linking to this story rumor about Justice Stevens’ health. But the guy is four hundred thirty six years old, according to Ace. He doesn’t have to be in poor health right now in order for SCOTUS appointments to be a GOTV issue. It’s just really surprising to me that so little noise has been made about this, what with control of both houses having been called into question this cycle. If it doesn’t get mentioned in the ads, it won’t be on people’s minds. SCOTUS: Out of sight, out of mind.

I am a little curious to know what Justice Stevens will have to say about the confirmation hearings for whoever is nominated to be Stevens’ successor (assuming he lives through the confirmation process, that is). After all, he didn’t seem to have any problem discussing John Roberts during his confirmation. I wasn’t sure how I felt about that, but commenting on your own successor might be even more bizarre.

Wulf Posted by Wulf on November 5, 2006 at 01:24 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.atlasblogged.com/cgi-bin/mt/mtb.cgi/433

Comments

Yeah, that is surprising. A few of the talk show hosts were pushing the SCOTUS angle during the last few desperation days, but for the most part - you're right - it's been a non-issue. I bet it plays a big role in '08, though.

Um, I guess there's not much chance of a Janice Rogers Brown making it through a Democrat Congress, eh?

Posted by: Rammage [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 8, 2006 10:02 PM


Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember This Information?