This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |

« Reading Spellings | Main | So Long, Suckers! »
(Updated 7:21 pm 8 Nov.)
Virginia voters yesterday easily passed an amendment to the state constitution that defines marriage as between one man and one woman.(Richmond Times-Dispatch)
The proposal, which will be added to the Bill of Rights of the Virginia Constitution, outlaws same-sex marriage and civil unions, as well as domestic partnerships and any relationship between unmarried couples that approximates marriage.
That's correct - it's in our Bill of Rights. Sick, ironic... shameful.
Update: There were a lot of commentaries against this amendment. Last week, David Boaz of the Cato Institute wrote:
There's never been a same-sex marriage in Virginia, and they've been outlawed by statute for more than 30 years. So why are Virginia voters being asked to vote on a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage?...
The irony in Virginia is that conservatives fearful of an out-of-control judiciary are in fact inviting the judiciary to get involved in micro-managing family law...
This amendment goes too far. But even its first sentence — the ban on gay marriage — is unworthy of a state that was the birthplace of American freedom. It is a cruel irony that this amendment to restrict contract rights and exclude loving couples from the institution of marriage is to be added to Virginia's Bill of Rights, a document originally written by the great Founder George Mason.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.atlasblogged.com/cgi-bin/mt/mtb.cgi/435
...there is something terribly wrong with adding an entirely exclusionary item to a Bill of Rights.
so very, very sad.
Posted by: doinkicarus
at November 9, 2006 8:58 PM
This Virginian did not vote for it. I did in fact vote for marriage; by voting against the only measure on the ballot that would ever prohibit one.
Posted by: blewsdawg
at November 15, 2006 10:10 PM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)