This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

Atlas Blogged
   Quote of the Day

No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms.

-Thomas Jefferson

   Recent Comments
   Categories
   Administrivia

The Neolibertarian Network

Syndicate this site (XML)
XHTML | CSS
Blogarama - The Blog Directory
blog search directory Listed on BlogShares

« Offensive How? | Main | Libertarians and Taxes »

September 21, 2006

All Your Conservative Base Are Belong To Us

The Godfather of Conservatism was actually a progressyve prophyt.

That's right, like Ronald Reagan before him, the Left is now attempting to claim Barry Goldwater as one of their own. That's how HBO's Mr. Conservative: Goldwater On Goldwater portrayed the five-time U.S. senator and former presidential candidate in a biographical documentary produced by Goldwater's grand-daughter.

I am not sure when and where this trend started, nor am I completely sure the reasoning behind it. I can only assume that by pointing to revered conservative icons and saying 'they're not so bad,' the Left has a basis for justifying that George Bush is El Diablo. But it's annoying, and I'd wish they'd stop.

The Officious Intermeddler sums up my feelings:

Interpretation is a necessary part of the art of writing history; in fact it's what [separated] good historians from mere clerks. However, there appears to be a growing [tendency] to re-interpret history to suit the political views of the historian. Perhaps Marxists historians are most guilty as they attempt to posit all history in terms of class struggle. What set off this particular rant is the recent HBO special on Barry Goldwater. Recently, the Senator has become something of an icon of the left/liberal contingent [and] is bandied about as something of an indictment against the "neo-cons". This special made the reason for that pretty clear. Barry favored abortion rights, had no problem with gays in the military and hated the "religious right". If there's anything that sums up the core values of the modern Democratic Party, it's abortion, gay rights and anti-religion.

So there you have it. Never mind that he opposed all civil rights legislation, never mind that he considered the use of nuclear weapons in Viet Nam to be legitimate, and never mind that he favored states rights when that was still a pseudonym for bigotry. Barry was OK with abortion and for your modern Democrat that's all that matters. As a result, Barry is no longer a bad guy.

Take heed Rush Limbaugh: Change your stance on abortion and you too may have your own HBO documentary someday. It's not liberal TV, it's HBO.

Rammage Posted by Rammage on September 21, 2006 at 12:31 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.atlasblogged.com/cgi-bin/mt/mtb.cgi/398

Comments

I had this discussion earlier over at Inactivist as I listened to Mona quote editor and publisher listing Ted Kennedy and a bunch of others praise the man:

http://inactivist.org/democrats_echo_the_goldwater_choice

I found the idea of these people truly admiring him or he them a rather pathetic stunt. My response was rather blunt:

As for Goldwater, he was certainly portrayed as an irrational hawk before he wasn't around to keep the Democrats from adopting the man they considered the extremist of the extreme when he was alive. Goldwater saw liberty broadly, neither of these parties as a whole would have appealed to him. Nether party has changed that much since he was alive. His allies would have been Ron Paul, the Republican liberty caucus and the like. Not the Democratic Party. He had the chance to make his views on that known and he was pretty damn clear. If he would have opposed Bush on Iraq for example, that would hardly have made him an ally of the Democrats. It is very questionable he would have opposed the attack on Iraq. It wouldn't have surprised me if he wanted it done before 9/11, but we don't know, so I suggest we stick to his actual legacy instead of using him as a sock puppet for people whose politics he pretty much despised.

I will argue against your portrayal of his record on Civil Rights which was generally quite good. He supported almost all of the CRA, and tried to get one which met his objections passed. He couldn't abide by the private as opposed to public accomodations portions. That was his line in the sand.

Posted by: Lance at September 23, 2006 4:33 PM


Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember This Information?