This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 |

« Notes on the NSA Wiretap situation: | Main | North Korean Counterfeiting »
Netroots activism has had a few impressive showings, including the recent victory by Ned Lamont over incumbent Senator Joe Lieberman in Connecticut’s primary elections. The Nation magazine summed it up thusly :
Ned Lamont's victory was driven by two triggers: First, the war elicited a primary opponent; then Internet activists convinced voters that he was a viable alternative.
In other words, there was a demand for change. There was somebody willing to supply that change. Internet activism simply got the message out.
Now, I don’t want to overstate the effect of the blogosphere on a campaign, but clearly blogs are able to get the message out and generate a lot of attention. If a politician has a message that resonates with voters, then a netroots campaign is exactly what he or she needs in this day and age. Name recognition, media coverage, and the buzz of the old-fashioned grassroots movements can help to bring down unpopular incumbents, or draw attention to a candidate who might not otherwise be seen as viable.
Can you see where I am going with this?
In an excellent post at WatchBlog, Richard Rhodes wrote:
The fact is whether many people want to admit it or not is that name recognition does matter. And this is the one thing that third parties lack.
Richard is correct that this problem will certainly burn “third party” candidates in the next presidential election. Congressional elections, however, are a different matter. Name recognition is easier to achieve in a single congressional district. But even in a congressional race, third party candidates generally lack name recognition because most people just don’t care. The real race is between the Democrat and the Republican… if there is both a Democrat and a Republican. I would like to suggest that in any race where there is not already both a Democrat and a Republican, there is a potential for a third party candidate to make a very strong showing and possibly even win a seat. Of course, trying this against a popular incumbent, this would present quite a challenge for even the most savvy and enthusiastic netroots activists. But what if the incumbent is unpopular… or what if there is no incumbent?
A netroots movement may be trying to build up around Libertarian Party candidate Bob Smither for Tom DeLay’s old congressional seat (District 22 in Texas). With Republicans unable to field a candidate, voters face a choice between the Democrat Nick Lampson and Libertarian Bob Smither. Will Republicans vote for a Libertarian just to spite the Democrats? Well, considering Smither’s promise to caucus with House Republicans if elected, and considering that Republican voters tend toward fiscal conservativism similar to that of Libertarians, they might be persuaded.
Jon Henke at QandO calls it the the Ron Paul option.
Other bloggers picking up the cause include Stephen VanDyke at Hammer of Truth, James at Swing State Project, and they’re arguing about it at Daily Kos.
A full read of the article by Lance at Inactivist.Org may spell out the best argument for pushing a netroots campaign. He asks for help in getting Bob Smither elected:
First, we have one more vote against big spending…
Second, we have the opportunity to send a message; most importantly Republicans have the chance to send a message that we as a citizenry are unhappy with the course our representatives have taken.
Hey, Lance, I'm on board. I can't vote for Bob Smither, but I can support his candidacy. I will direct people to his website. I will encourage netroots activism, not only among Libertarians but among all "third party" supporters, and independents. If you are reading this, please look into Bob Smither and see if you can support him and/or his candidacy.
Let's get the word out. Bob Smither for Congress.
(This article was originally posted at WatchBlog)
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.atlasblogged.com/cgi-bin/mt/mtb.cgi/385
"Ned Lamont's victory was driven by two triggers..."
No, it was driven by four million triggers -- the dollars Lamont spent from his own fortune.
In the post-Buckley, post-McConnell campaign finance framework we now have, people like Ned Lmaont, Jon Corzine and Michael Bloomberg will increasingly be buying electoral victories (which, as I understand it, was precisely what campaign finance reform is supposed to prevent -- go figure).
Posted by: KipEsquire at August 28, 2006 5:34 AM
Hey Wolf,
I just happened to wander over and saw this. Thanks for the link, I didn't see it because it isn't to my own site so I will get on with putting you on our blog coverage page so people can come on over and follow your coverage. We have a page devoted specifically to the campaign and resources to learn more about it as well as help out. If you see anybody covering this let me know and I'll include them. Go ahead and e-mail others to blog about this and point them to Inactivist and A Second Hand Conjecture so I can keep the coverage up to date.
Posted by: Lance at August 28, 2006 1:15 PM
I'm skeptical - as long as people widely associate Libertarians with Lyndon LaRouche (which were never even associated!) Libertarians will be considered nutjobs.
The best thing that the LP could do would be to launch an education campaign and temper its politics to traditional issues where it intersects with the modern political landscape.
That means that the War on Drugs, abolishment of the FDA and other such issues - while good policy - are the kiss of death. And no amount of good campaign fortune, in the guise of single party races, will change that.
Posted by: smilerz
at August 28, 2006 2:11 PM
smilerz,
If you go to the Post at inactivist or the Smither campaign page at www.asecondhandconjecture.net you will see that that is exactly what we are trying to do. In reality this is not about the LP, I don't think many of us trying to accomplish this are members. Many are even Republicans. It is about this race, this opportunity and trying to get at least one more fiscal sanity vote.
Posted by: Lance at August 28, 2006 2:33 PM
Have you seen the new poll putting Smither far ahead of the Republican in a very conservative Republican district (of course, NO Republican is on the ballot, and the idiots are trying to run a write-in campaign rather than support Smither):
Lampson, D @ 41%
Smither, L @ 25%
Undecided @ 23%
Shelley, R @ 11%
"MR. SMITHER GOES TO WASHINGTON"
NO Libertarian has ever WON Congress. Ron Paul, the Republican turned Libertarian, also represented Dist 22--- so there are strong L roots there.
LLL
laughlinou@yahoo.com
Posted by: Lloyd Laughlin at September 28, 2006 8:09 PM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)