This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 |

« Representative Brad Miller on Government Science |
Main
| Iran Seeks Nukes Nikes »
As much as it pains me to link to USA Today, with this story, I just have to.
Shades of the Patriot Act? In what Marvel Comics calls "the most politically charged comic series ever," superheroes must reveal their secret identities and register with the government or resist and be hunted. The seven-issue miniseries, Marvel: Civil War, on sale May 3, finds the government enacting the Super Hero Registration Act, declaring that such folks as the Hulk, the X-Men and the Fantastic Four are "living Weapons of Mass Destruction."
The story "is an allegory for the current American political landscape," says editor in chief Joe Quesada. "Should people sacrifice their civil liberties to create a safer world?"
Strait-laced heroes such as Iron Man are willing to comply, but rebels such as Captain America are ready to resist. Which side will each hero choose? That's part of the sell.
And don't miss Marvel: Civil War #2 in June. Creators promise Spider-Man's decision will be one of the biggest shocks in that character's (gasp!) 44-year history.
I never collected comics. But these, I think I will have to pick up.
Comments from Andrew A. Smith of Scripps Howard News Service:
"Civil War" has been building in titles like "Amazing Spider-Man," "Fantastic Four" and, most importantly, a one-shot called "New Avengers: Illuminati." These books have established that public concern in Marvel books has been building over the burgeoning numbers of masked, super-powered vigilantes during a time of war.
"The end of the series has massive ramifications," [Series writer Mark Millar] said. "This is one of those things that comes along that shapes things for times to come. ... There's very much a pre-Civil War and post-Civil War Marvel Universe coming at you."
"On the one hand you know people are saying there's all this political allegory," Millar said. "But at the other end it's all about these big Marvel fights between these two characters, which is all I read growing up. ... Marvel has always been about who's the biggest and who's the strongest, whether it's the Hulk or the Thing. In many a ways it's a 7-year-old's fantasy."
But a fantasy with teeth. And unlike most comics, no side is presented as completely correct and no facile answers are supplied or suggested.
So this isn't just kid's stuff. And reading around on some different sites, I note that Millar says in interview after interview that he doesn't want this to be a black-and-white issue... or rather, a red-and-blue issue. None of the superheroes comes out as a conservative, apparently, nor do any claim to be liberals. The series promises to tackle complex issues of liberty and security, so for those of us who never owned more than a few comics, or even for those of you who have never read a single one, maybe on this subject you ought to. It could be thought provoking. And if not, then hopefully it will at least be fun.
Comic fans might enjoy this article by Dave Richards at The Comic Wire - check the forum and the Related Articles at the bottom.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.atlasblogged.com/cgi-bin/mt/mtb.cgi/270
I'm not sure what's going on with me lately, but this is about the 10th thing that I've disagreed with you on this week. Of course, some disagreement betwixt us will be healthy for the sometimes monotone atmosphere of AB.
I think this is ridiculous that yet another entertainment medium feels the need to "Go Simpsons" on us and get preachy. It's a comic book, for cryin' out loud. As someone who was formerly very into comics, this politicizing would turn me off today.
Let the Avengers take on Galactus without the allegory for the current American landscape mumbo-jumbo and I'll get my political commentary from the news.
(btw - let me head this off at the pass: yes, I know that comics have contained allegory for years (i.e. Sentinels), but it seems to be getting progressively more intertwined with the *fantasy* that comics provide. Even Tolkien said he hated allegory)
Posted by: Rammage
at April 15, 2006 8:52 PM
I am having trouble with this comment. It's not like Marvel has traditionally avoided these kinds of topics. In fact, some characters exist only because of this kind of stuff. What was Captain America originally? WWII propaganda. He fought Nazis and Japs during WWII. Then he was Cold War propaganda. But for years, they have written him to face conflicts between what America stands for, and what its politicians try to enact. How is this different?
Americans feel a struggle, a conflict, between security and privacy. They have for years. I guess you see comics as a way to escape that part of the world - hence your use of the word "fantasy". But these guys have always used comics as a way to address that part of the world, not escape it.
I would find it more preachy if they wrote all characters to fall in line one way or the other on issues of privacy vs security. Showing conflict is good fiction.
Posted by: Wulf at April 15, 2006 10:09 PM
I am having trouble with this comment about my comment.
Captain America was WWII propaganda? And Jedis only see shades of gray, right? Captain America was black and white, good old-fashioned good vs. evil. Steve Rogers stood against Nazis in WWII, stood against the Evil Empire in the Cold War, and fought a few intergalactic baddies on the way, as well. There wasn't a lot of proselytizing and preaching about it; as it was pure fun and escape.
It's much like the difference between the first three Star Wars movies, and the latter three, when George Llucas decided to lecture us on real-life global politics, essentially destroying a modern epic. I'd hate to see comic books drawn in the same direction, as I noticed was starting to happen throughout the Eighties.
Again, when I pick up a book like - say - LotR, The Two Towers, I don't want to be exposed to what the author's view is of George W. Bush and NSA wiretapping. Because frankly, I don't give a damn. What I want is to read an epic fantasy about good triumphing over evil. I'll gladly get my Op Eds from the newspapers, blogosphere, Atlas Blogged, Lefty NPR, and the various news programs on TV.
Posted by: Rammage
at April 16, 2006 9:21 AM
I am having trouble with... um... hang on. [head spins]
Okay. Captain America was WWII propaganda. I mean that in an objective way. Propaganda is not bad per se. Cap was a vehicle for kids to participate in anti-Nazi sentiment, and then anti-Soviet sentiment. I haven't read any comics lately, but I am sure he is anti-al Qaeda. That much is black and white, good vs evil. But Cap was always different from FF or Spidey - it's always been about the Super Patriotic Eagle Scout Adventure Comic.
I don't see how this new series would have to depart from that.
I think the difference between this and something like the SW prequels is that the comics are market driven. Little kids don't buy comics anymore. The "Golden Age" is over. Heck, most of the characters in this Civil War are from the later "Silver Age" anyway - they have always dealt with areas of greater moral ambiguity. That's what there is a market for these days.
The plot device of categorizing super-powered people is ambiguous - it is something that has its positives and negatives, especially from the point of view of the super characters. Cap wants the world to be black-and-white, but in reality he would have to deal with the realities of legislators and executives whose actions are someimtes of questionable Constitionality. It's as real as the sunrise. To ignore it is to consign that comic to the history books, because there isn't a market for Cap fighting Nazis anymore. They would go out of business.
Again, when I pick up a book like - say - LotR, The Two Towers, I don't want to be exposed to what the author's view is of George W. Bush and NSA wiretapping. Because frankly, I don't give a damn. What I want is to read an epic fantasy about good triumphing over evil.
Sounds like you are not the target audience, that's all. But I would guess that a regular reader would find this to be very in line with what Marvel Comics has written about over the last couple of decades.
Posted by: Wulf at April 16, 2006 2:06 PM
Does anyone remember the comic series about how the heros reacted right after 9/11? Didn't think so. When comics tend to take a specific issue and make it a main focus, then it gets tricky. There is a way to handle it and maintain the entertainment value (see The Incredibles for such an example). I would have to agree that an issue about whether spider man decides to reveal his identity or not is really not that exciting to me. Much like batman, pretty much everyone knows who the hell he is by now anyway. People turn to comics for the escapism of the medium, and not to see their favorite heros battling issues they deal with in real lives. What fun is that?
See The Hulk struggle with his taxes!
Witness Iron Man clash against metal detectors at airport security!
Gasp in horror as Captain America is sued for copyright infringement by the US Government for using the name "America" in his moniker.
If we wanted realism in our comics, we would just read Doonesbury every day.
Posted by: Boon at April 19, 2006 11:14 AM
Sounds like you are not the target audience, either.
I'll let you know how the first issue is.
Posted by: Wulf at April 19, 2006 12:51 PM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)