This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |

« Make the Issue Go Away | Main | Don Surber: Porkbusting Is Futile »
You know those times when you are watching a football game on TV and the halfback takes the hand off and cuts through the defenders and is gone? And you know how, sometimes, the safeties are not in a position to have any chance of catching him, but the cornerback chases him all the way down the field anyway? Just running after the guy, knowing they can't catch him but also knowing that if they just stop, they are giving that halfback an extra moral victory?
The west's confrontation with Iran over its nuclear activities intensified yesterday after Britain claimed that Tehran could acquire the technological capability to build a bomb by the end of the year.
A day after the International Atomic Energy Agency referred the dispute to the United Nations security council, British officials also indicated that London would back Washington's efforts to impose a UN deadline of about 30 days for Iran's compliance with international demands.
Or else we will do what? Face it, we aren't going to do anything that will stop them from getting the bomb. The only thing that can stop Iran now is a catastrophic earthquake or a large meteor that destroys the sites where the technology is being developed.
A senior Foreign Office official said that while it could take Iran several years to build a serviceable nuclear weapon, it might gain the technical knowhow within months. "By the end of the year is a ... realistic period," said the official. "It would be really damaging to regional security if Iran even acquired the technology to enable it to develop a nuclear weapon."Until now, European diplomats have referred to a period of five to 10 years during which Iran might potentially build a bomb, while conceding that hard evidence is lacking. By publicly focusing on the level of Iran's technical capabilities, Britain may have shortened the timeframe for a peaceful resolution of the crisis.
Face it! Iran has the technology to build nukes. They may not actually have it today, but there will be no stopping them. They are at the 10-years, the 5, the couple-of-months yard line...
So now what? Are we at all prepared to deal with a nuclear Iran? This is the country we call the most active state sponsor of terrorism - how should we be looking at this, exactly?
Diplomats say that the west is prepared to enact sanctions that will hurt the regime in Tehran, but not the Iranian people. Considering the track record with other nations, I don't believe that for one moment. This is only going to get uglier.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.atlasblogged.com/cgi-bin/mt/mtb.cgi/243
There is no definite proof that Iran has or wants to build a nuclear bomb. The same way in which USA said Iraq had WMDs
Posted by: Muslim Unity at March 10, 2006 5:45 AM
Muslim Unity, you might want to look more carefully into the WMD story. Try here: http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=1417
As for proof of Iran's intentions, I don't personally think it is necessary to wait for a mushroom cloud, or for Ahmadinejad to announce Iran's intentions. It's pretty clear what they want, and what they are working toward. If you would like me to bury my head in the sand, I'm very sorry, but I can't.
Posted by: Wulf at March 10, 2006 8:34 AM
How, precisely, do you sanction leaders (enough that it will change behavior) and not harm the citizens? I'm clueless.
Posted by: Chris at March 10, 2006 10:14 AM
Chris, I can't imagine what those sanctions could be. I'd love to hear it. Perhaps we are going to cut off shipments of microphones and television cameras? Most world leaders would shrivel up and die without those. Other than that, I am also clueless.
Posted by: Wulf
at March 10, 2006 11:52 AM
Geez, without sounding like too much of a doomsayer, I have pretty much already reached the conclusion that the widespread destruction of Israel is inevitable at this point. At that time, then, the U.S. will have moral justification for taking out Iran (and, of course, before they start strapping their newfound nuclear technology to the top of Russian-built ICBM's.) All hope is not lost though: U.S. Jews (who perplexingly and overwhelmingly vote anti-war Democrat) could step up and demand that preemptive action towards Iran be taken now. Oh, um, yeah, all hope is lost.
Posted by: Rammage
at March 10, 2006 12:26 PM
I guess Iranians very well saw what happned to US-N.KOREA conflict, N.KOREA declared it has ABomb and got US off there backs. So expect a similar announcement from IRAN in coming days. The result? Simple,end of conflict.
Posted by: Third eye at April 11, 2006 6:10 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)