This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

Atlas Blogged
   Quote of the Day

Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.

-Thomas Jefferson

   Recent Comments
   Categories
   Administrivia

The Neolibertarian Network

Syndicate this site (XML)
XHTML | CSS
Blogarama - The Blog Directory
blog search directory Listed on BlogShares

« The So-Called Holocaust | Main | When They Eulogize Me, I Hope They Stay On Target »

February 7, 2006

Class Action Against iPods

What? What? Did you say that smoking is bad for my health? I couldn't hear you over my deafening iPod!

A complaint filed with a California court this week alleged that Apple’s music players were “inherently defective in design” and “not adorned with adequate warnings regarding the likelihood of hearing loss”...“Millions of consumers have had their hearing put at risk by Apple’s conduct,” the complaint said. Apple could not be reached yesterday morning for comment.
(story here)

Well, what comment could they be expected to make? Just like the lawsuits against Big Tobacco, some jackass is digging for cash in the deep pockets of corporate America. I honestly wonder if these people are serious, or if they know that they are absolute flaming morons. I'm guessing they know, but that's just a guess.

The article notes:

The iPod user manual already warns customers about the potential for permanent hearing loss if the player’s earphones or headphones are used a high volume. But the complaint alleged that Apple did not advise users about what constituted a high volume or a safe level of noise.

Well, yeah, but who reads the stupid manual, right? Not that we should have to - loud noises in your ear are not good for your ear, and this is something that nobody should have to tell you. It's no different than burning a leaf and sucking in the smoke. You are free to do so, but it should never enter your mind that your body is prepared to do this regularly and still function at its best.

An interesting observation from the Editorial Board at the Exponent (Purdue University's student newspaper):

The complaintant, however, does not even know if he has suffered any hearing loss because of the product.

Still, the Editorial Board thinks something needs to be done. Their suggestions?
- Apple should be more explicit in their warnings, in order to avoid future lawsuits.
- We should better educate children about the dangers of 100+ dB in our ears.

This is as ridiculous as the lawsuit. Apple should (but certainly won't) tell people where to get off with regard to the volume on the earphones. And children already learn about the dangers of loud noises - the problem isn't a lack of exposure to the facts. It's just that people don't care. It is in every textbook that touches on the science of sound, and even in some preschool books. We all know the real answer to these type of lawsuits. It is amazing that everybody seems to recognize this, and yet they keep coming. Each more ridiculous than the last. "My iPod was too loud, so I am suing." You can't make this stuff up.

As an afterthought, wouldn't it be grand to see Apple's defense boil down to "If it's too loud, you're too old"?

Wulf Posted by Wulf on February 7, 2006 at 10:20 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.atlasblogged.com/cgi-bin/mt/mtb.cgi/211

Comments

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember This Information?