This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |

« Only the Government may Kill the Weeds! | Main | Montgomery County Enforces New Strathmore Law »
President Bush appointed John Bolton as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations today, five months after Mr. Bolton was nominated to the post.
You probably don’t need me to tell you that the president’s political allies supported this action, and his political opponents… well… opposed this action. That’s the job of the opposition party, so it’s expected, and I forgive them. After all, when we had a Democrat issuing recess appointments from the White House, the GOP sat in opposition and shook their heads over some of them. It’s just expected. It’s like bringing a gift to a housewarming party – we just know to do that.
A nice article today in the L.A. Times if you like to keep score:
Bush: 106 recess appointments
Clinton: 140 recess appointments
Kinda makes the screaming seem more ridiculous, doesn’t it? For example, Noah Leavitt made an absolute fool of himself back on the 4th of July in an attempt to explain to the general public how a recess appointment would ruin all of our lives.
That cowardly action would insult Congress and the world, undermine U.S. credibility overseas and mock the democracy we celebrate. It would also sink Bush - who has the lowest approval rating of a second-term president since Nixon during the Watergate scandal - even further in the eyes of the American public.
Leavitt even explained how the Democrats have only been blocking Bolton’s appointment in order to play politics, wasting months of time on this issue. (They initially had every intention of confirming the man, but they decided instead to use his nomination to make political hay. And they say *Bolton* has a lack of respect for the UN? Come on, Senators!) Leavitt’s article then went on to misrepresent the Constitutionality of recess appointments, and the question of what would happen to Bolton after the recess. He urged Bush to “reserve the power for its intended use: A true emergency.”
Right. Like, say, a Democrat president would.
Now as I have said, I understand that it is the job of the opposition party to obstruct the White House, and I do not have any problem with them doing just that. Obviously, Noah Leavitt is one of the many Democrats out there who are just doing the best they can, and he will be replaced by some right-wing legal columnist just as soon as another Democrat takes up residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. But, as I said, it looks ridiculous when the screaming is taken to such rabid extremes. Talk about mocking U.S. credibility overseas.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.atlasblogged.com/cgi-bin/mt/mtb.cgi/17
"The abuse of power and the cloak of secrecy from the White House continues. ... It's a devious maneuver that evades the constitutional requirement of Senate consent and only further darkens the cloud over Mr. Bolton's credibility at the U.N." — Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass.
[Mr. Ted Kennedy to blurb writer]
I'm going to [hic] need a few sentences on this Bolton matter. Keep it short, and make sure that you [hic] get in the following words: abuse, power, cloak, secrecy, devious, maneuver, evades, darkens, cloud, and credibility.
Posted by: rammage at August 2, 2005 1:12 AM