This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 |

« National Education Association and National Endowment for the Arts Merge; Form New Acronym | Main | The Hollywood Touch »
Here it is. My first blog entry ever, and it’s going to be about golf. I promise this won’t be a recurring trend (golf writing), but there is just something that I need to get off my chest.
Let me start by saying one thing. I think that the arrival of Tiger Woods to the golf scene was the best thing to ever happen to the sport. He almost single-handedly turned what was once a game for men in terrible outfits into a worldwide phenomenon. More people than ever have taken up the game, and he opened the doors for everyone. Kids, minorities, and even underprivileged people now have opportunities that never existed before Tiger came along to take up the game and excel at it. Programs are now in place through many charities to help. It has been great for golf.
That being said, I am very disappointed with the fact that the USGA and the PGA are allowing women to play in men’s golf events.
First it was Annika Sorenstam in 2003, then Michelle Wie in 2004 and this year. I am in no way saying they don’t have the ability to compete, even though neither was able to make a cut (four tournaments combined). I just don’t think it’s right.
As for Wie, her talent is unquestionable. Her future in golf is undeniable. She will be a great player. Mark my words.
My issue is that so far this year, she has played in two of the men’s tournaments, and is currently competing in the men’s Amateur Public Links (APL) championship which, oh by the way, carries with it a possible entry into next year’s Masters tournament for the winner. Since 1989, the APL champion has been invited to The Masters.
Before you get all uppity about discrimination or anything else you want to call it, consider this: There is a series of tournaments put together for women to compete called the LPGA. Get it? Ladies PGA. The USGA also has a ladies APL. The men are not allowed to play in either the LPGA or the USGA events sanctioned for women. Why is it allowed for women to play in the events sanctioned for men?
I also feel for the PGA touring pro who is trying to make a living on tour be told that he cannot play a certain week because they gave his spot to a woman. Here’s a man who went through the rigors of Qualifying School (considered by many as the toughest six days of golf) only to be denied the chance to play in a tournament that he was entitled to play in.
These women are great golfers, no doubt about it. But they have a tour set up for themselves for them to compete on. They have to qualify for that tour as well. Don’t take away a spot that someone else qualified for on the other tour, please.
As for Wie at the APL? She just won her second match of the day to move to the quarterfinals. Three more wins and who knows? We could just see Wie at the Masters. Boy wouldn’t that just rile up Hootie again?
UPDATE: Michelle Wie lost the following day in her quarterfinal match, albeit to the eventual champion of the tournament. There is a bright side for her, as all quarterfinalists are automatically invited back to the APL the following year. Not that I'm happy about it.
Just what I always wanted - more people involved in golf. Because the courses were not crowded enough and expensive enough back in the 1980s. Higher demand, that's exactly what golf needed!
Posted by: Wulf at July 15, 2005 1:54 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)